This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a dialogical point of view.According to my account, a counterconsideration is part of a critical reaction from a real or imagined opponent, and an arguer may take Diabetes Care it into account in his argument in at least six fully responsive ways.Conductive arguments (or: pro and con arguments, balance of con-siderations arguments) will be characterized as one of these types.
In this manner, the paper aims to show how conducive, and related Ski de fond - Accessoires - Fixations - Skate kinds of argument can be understood dialogically.